From tire manufacturers to makers of industrial gaskets, the CTS Rubber Program includes companies from a wide range of industries who share one goal: reliable test data. Participating in these tests will help your lab better ensure the dependability of its results.
CTS teams with standards organizations, instrument manufacturers and technology centers to provide participants with the expertise needed for measurement assurance and to keep the tests relevant to industries using the program. Combine that knowledge with CTS' extensive experience in proficiency testing and you end up with a powerful and objective tool with which to continuously monitor your performance and prove measurement competence.
Rubber came into its own during WWII as industries worked overtime to supply the American war effort. When the natural rubber plantations came under Japanese control, the race was on to develop synthetic rubbers. As a result, the US government poured money into related projects. Years after the war, rubber remained a big industry and the US was a major player.
The National Bureau of Standards (NBS, now the National Institute of Standards & Technology or NIST) for several years had provided Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) to various industries, but were unsure how individual laboratories used those standards to improve the quality of their measurements. In addition, NBS wanted to know what steps were taken when such standards were not available. Through answering those questions, NBS hoped to be able to assist labs in improving test measurements. While people were not unfamiliar with interlaboratory testing, the majority of those studies had concentrated on validation of a test method. In 1969, specifically for the rubber industry, NBS created something revolutionary: a large-scale proficiency testing program that focused mainly on overall lab performance.
The NBS Rubber Program originally focused on vulcanized rubber. The initial testing round had 72 participants, a large number for a first-of-its-kind venture and a reflection of the need in the industry. Participation remained strong, and it became clear that the NBS program was more than a research study. Since CTS had already worked with NBS on interlaboratory programs for paper and color measurement, NBS also turned to CTS for assistance in running the Rubber Program. CTS expanded it in 1971 to include tests for other characteristics of raw and vulcanized rubber. Complete responsibility for the program's operation was formally transferred to CTS in the mid 1970s. Key to the programs enduring success was the fact that, as other projects took priority, the effort to develop rubber SRMs at NBS/NIST had all but fizzled by the mid 1990s. Left to the private sector, such work was found to be too expensive, with few standards available to date. Thus, an on-going proficiency testing program became an incredibly cost-effective way to validate a labs results so much so that several of the original participating organizations are still enrolled in the program today.
Starting in the mid 1980s, the Rubber Division of the American Chemical Society (ACS) created an Advisory Committee on Testing Procedures to provide guidance to providers of rubber testing programs. Several instrument manufacturers also work with CTS to ensure that the program remains relevant to the industry. Today, laboratories from around the world participate in the CTS Rubber Program to continuously monitor their performance and prove measurement reliability.
The Rubber Program is an annual program and testing rounds are conducted on a quarterly basis. Subscribers participate in four, three or two quarters depending on the enrollment date.
Note that data due dates occur approximately 6 weeks after a shipment date and that results must be submitted on or before a data due date in order to be included in the report.
Participants can track shipments, submit data and access reports through the CTS Customer Portal.
*While CTS will make every effort to adhere to the published program schedules, all dates provided are tentative and are subject to change.
Includes Qtrs: | Samples Ship: | Data Due: | Report Issued: |
---|---|---|---|
1 | early February | mid March | early April |
2 | early May | mid June | early July |
3 | early August | mid September | early October |
4 | early November | mid December | early January |
Includes Qtrs: | Samples Ship: | Data Due: | Report Issued: |
---|---|---|---|
2 | early May | mid June | early July |
3 | early August | mid September | early October |
4 | early November | mid December | early January |
Includes Qtrs: | Samples Ship: | Data Due: | Report Issued: |
---|---|---|---|
3 | early August | mid September | early October |
4 | early November | mid December | early January |
2nd Quarter 2024
Rubber Summary Report No. 220
1st Quarter 2024
Rubber Summary Report No. 219
4th Quarter 2023
Rubber Summary Report No. 218
3rd Quarter 2023
Rubber Summary Report No. 217
2nd Quarter 2023
Rubber Summary Report No. 216
1st Quarter 2023
Rubber Summary Report No. 215
4th Quarter 2022
Rubber Summary Report No. 214
3rd Quarter 2022
Rubber Summary Report No. 213
2nd Quarter 2022
Rubber Summary Report No. 212
1st Quarter 2022
Rubber Summary Report No. 211
4th Quarter 2021
Rubber Summary Report No. 210
3rd Quarter 2021
Rubber Summary Report No. 209
2nd Quarter 2021
Rubber Summary Report No. 208
1st Quarter 2021
Rubber Summary Report No. 207
4th Quarter 2020
Rubber Summary Report No. 206
3rd Quarter 2020
Rubber Summary Report No. 205
2nd Quarter 2020
Rubber Summary Report No. 204
1st Quarter 2020
Rubber Summary Report No. 203
4th Quarter 2019
Rubber Summary Report No. 202
3rd Quarter 2019
Rubber Summary Report No. 201
2nd Quarter 2019
Rubber Summary Report No. 200
1st Quarter 2019
Rubber Summary Report No. 199
4th Quarter 2018
Rubber Summary Report No. 198
3rd Quarter 2018
Rubber Summary Report No. 197
2nd Quarter 2018
Rubber Summary Report No. 196
1st Quarter 2018
Rubber Summary Report No. 195
4th Quarter 2017
Rubber Summary Report No. 194
3rd Quarter 2017
Rubber Summary Report No. 193
2nd Quarter 2017
Rubber Summary Report No. 192
1st Quarter 2017
Rubber Summary Report No. 191
4th Quarter 2016
Rubber Summary Report No. 190
3rd Quarter 2016
Rubber Summary Report No. 189
2nd Quarter 2016
Rubber Summary Report No. 188
1st Quarter 2016
Rubber Summary Report No. 187
4th Quarter 2015
Rubber Summary Report No. 186
3rd Quarter 2015
Rubber Summary Report No. 185
2nd Quarter 2015
Rubber Summary Report No. 184
1st Quarter 2015
Rubber Summary Report No. 183
4th Quarter 2014
Rubber Summary Report No. 182
3rd Quarter 2014
Rubber Summary Report No. 181
2nd Quarter 2014
Rubber Summary Report No. 180
1st Quarter 2014
Rubber Summary Report No. 179
Participants in CTS Rubber Program tests can access Test Instructions on the CTS Customer Portal.
A Guide to Interpreting Performance Analysis Reports, available as well on the CTS Customer Portal, assists participants in understanding and getting maximum benefit from the individual reports issued at the completion of each testing round.